It’s been almost a century since the Colorado River compact was created, divvying up the resources of this mighty waterway between seven states and Mexico – that’s almost 40 million people dependent on the river in some way. Traditionally the economic value of the river was based on what the water could be used for when extracted…agriculture, mining, industry. But as Maeve Conran reports for Connecting the Drops, more people are pointing to the economic value of keeping water in the river itself.
The Fraser River (above photo) in Grand County is a tributary of the Colorado River which starts in Rocky Mountain National Park. It runs through the heart of the town of Fraser and neighboring Winter Park. These towns attract skiers in winter and fly fishers and outdoor enthusiasts the rest of the year.
“The recreation is all based around the river. The snow making water for all our ski areas comes out of a river…it’s the absolute base of the recreational system.”
Dennis Saffell has been a real estate broker for 34 years in the mountain communities of Grand and Summit counties. He says there’s a direct connection to property values and proximity to the river.
“If your property is on a river or has a view of a river, it’s going to be substantially more expensive, regardless of what it is…a condominium, a house, it’s going to be substantially more expensive than a property that’s not on a river.”
Saffell says a loss of flow in the river would (likely) decrease the values for all properties in these mountain communities dependent on the river for a tourism economy.
That’s something that others in western slope communities are well aware of, including Jim Pokdrandt with the Colorado River District. That’s the principal water policy and planning agency for the Colorado River Basin within the state.
“We understand that water left in the river is important to the economy and if we have dried up rivers then, we’d have degradation to our western slope economy.”
Pokdrandt says the fortunes of many western slope towns hinge on understanding that the strength of local economies is beginning to shift from taking water out of the river to leaving it in.
“Rafting, that’s a big deal, skiing that’s a big deal now, hunting, fishing…this is our economy here on the west slope. Yes ag is still big and yes there’s still some mining, but our new economy is based on water in the rivers in western Colorado.”
Historically, most Colorado water rights have involved uses that divert water from the streams, but back in the early 1970s lawmakers began to recognize the need to create rights allowing water to remain in the river, to help protect ecology. But that was just a first step, now 43 years later, a lot of water is still being taken out of the Colorado River basin and diverted to the east. There are 13 major trans mountain diversions and many other smaller ones. This concerns advocates like Craig Mackey, co-director of Protect the Flows.
“In the 21st century we have an economic reason to have the river itself, the recreation economy, the tourism economy and I think the hardest one to quantify is a quality of life economy.”
The non-profit advocates for conservation of the Colorado River Basin, pointing to the connection between a healthy river and healthy economies.
“People want to live here, they want to locate here, they want to grow businesses here, they want to raise their families here and water and our snow in our mountains, which becomes the water in our rivers, is a huge driver in that quality of life economy that we’re so lucky to have here in the state of Colorado.”
Protect the Flows worked with Arizona State University in 2014 on the first study on the economic impact of the Colorado River. It found that the major waterway generates $1.4 trillion in economic benefits annually throughout the entire 7 state river basin. In Colorado the tourism and outdoor recreation economy tied to the river brings in more than $9 billion annually.
The Colorado Water Plan acknowledges the need to keep water in streams, but it also acknowledges the water needs of growing cities. Realtor Dennis Seffell says even more needs to be done.
“Now it’s time to take a new fresh look as to why it’s important to keep rivers full of water.”
A prolonged drought in the South West, paired with over allocation has left the Colorado River in a sorry state. Front Range communities, largely dependent on that western water, are having some success with conservation. But with an additional 2 million people expected to move to the Denver metro area over the next 25 years, demand will only increase.